The Oregon “Pandemic” “Emergency.” you been Conned
By Francis Steffan
I would like to start by defining a term that will be used throughout this article, “pandemic.”
A “Pandemic” is simply an “epidemic” that has crossed national borders.
Therefore “epidemic” and associated terms also need defined, to wit: Endemic; refers to the constant presence and/or usual prevalence of a disease or infectious agent in a population within a geographic area. Hyperendemic refers to persistent, high levels of disease occurrence. Epidemic refers to an increase, often sudden, in the number of cases of a disease above what is normally expected in that population in that area. (Centers for Disease Control; Lesson 1: Introduction to Epidemiology; Section 11: Epidemic Disease Occurrence; Level of disease.)
It is important to notice that “epidemic” is determined based on a preset expectation of whoever is deciding a circumstance is “epidemic,” it is not based on fact or actual circumstance, but only an expectation that is exceeded.
Therefore, technically, if there was zero flu for two years, like during the “covid fraud,” but then, all of a sudden, there was five cases, it could by definition, and dishonest interpretation, be deemed an “epidemic.” Just so you know.
The deviants that like to be called “the elite” use scary words to manipulate the population by fear because the vast majority really don't know what very many words actually mean, like the idiotic Representative from New York that thinks “literal” means the voices in her head.
The reason for this is that the public (government) school system, for decades now, does not teach your children to look up definitions of the words they do not know the meaning of, but instead, to just skip over them and figure it out by the “context” of the surrounding words, that they are unlikely to know the meanings of either, this is what we naturally do and it is not a critical problem for those with an already developed vocabulary base, but for children with a poorly developed vocabulary base it has been devastating.
They look like they read, they sound like they read but they are parrots that have little comprehension of the words they read, write, speak or hear and this severely disables their ability to comprehend anything but the most simple written or verbalized concepts, like fear, anger and outrage.
I say all this to justify my placement of definitions through this article and to lower your expectations when trying to explain to others what you understand to be true.
For most people that reject the truth it is not a function of evil on their part but ignorance and the arrogance to believe that “if I don't understand it then it cant be true because my communist facilitator (public school teacher) tells me I'm smart”
On the other hand, it is my belief that the deviants calling themselves “elite” are evil to the core, possessed by evil, grown from the root of their love of money.
You cannot compromise with evil, you can not negotiate with evil, evil must be defeated or it will defeat you. Everyone is not your enemy however, some are, and it is critical to your survival to properly identify them.
Nevertheless, this article is not a call to action, it is to notice you to what has been and is occurring in Oregon, what you will do about it is your decision alone.
In Oregon a declaration of “emergency” is only authorized by statute, not by the State's constitution, and that particular statute that purportedly authorizes the current ongoing, never ending Statewide “pandemic” “emergency,” or threat of such, is found at Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 401.165 and the controlling definition of “emergency” applicable to ORS 401.165 is found at ORS 401.025.
ORS 401.165(1): “The Governor may declare a state of emergency by proclamation at the request of a county governing body or after determining that an emergency has occurred or is imminent.”
ORS 401.165 in numerous sections details the requirements of counties and others requesting an “emergency” declaration. Certifications and assessments are required of them however, nothing is required of the governor except to “determine” that an “emergency” has occurred.
To discover what criteria is required to make such a sweeping, liberty killing determination we need to examine the controlling definition of “emergency” found at ORS 401.025.
Understand, without some legislatively enacted criteria guiding the “determination” that an “emergency” has occurred the statute would be vague, ambiguous and arbitrary which would render it lawfully void.
However, we have ORS 401.025 which purportedly defines “emergency.”
ORS 401.025: (1)“Emergency” means a human created or natural event or circumstance that causes or threatens widespread loss of life, injury to person or property, human suffering or financial loss, including but not limited to:
As you can see, ANY circumstance or event that is claimed as a source of “emergency,” by statute, MUST cause or “threaten” “widespread.”
Neither “widespread” nor “threatens” is defined by applicable statute which renders ORS 401.165 vague and ambiguous and therefore unconstitutional, void, and enforced in violation of any elected officials Oath of Office, rendering them as acting in their private capacity under color of law.
Why is a law void if the definitions applicable to a statute are vague or in this case non existent?
Imagine conversing with ten of your friends and one of them states, “I think murderers should be executed.” Some may agree with the statement, however, some may not and some may even feel threatened based on their own particular fears and perceptions.
Arbitrary: Not supported by fair, solid, and substantial cause, and without reason given. Black's Law Dictionary, Treloar v. Bigge, L. R. 9 Exch. 155.
Ambiguous: A phrase that is not clearly understood. The different interpretations can lead to confusion. This can be done on purpose or because there is a general lack of knowledge.
Vagueness: Uncertainty. 2. Certainty is required in contracts, wills, pleadings, judgments, and indeed in all the acts on which courts have to give a judgment, and if they be vague, so as not to be understood, they are in general invalid. 5 B. & C. 583; 1 Russ. & M. 116 1 Ch. Pract. 123. A charge of "frequent intemperance" and "habitual indolence" are vague and too general. 2 Mart. Lo. Rep. N. S. 530. See Certainty; Nonsense; Uncertainty.
“Threatens” is a term that means different things to different people at different times yet is a term used to describe a condition justifying an “emergency.” Without further clarification through statutory definition “threatens” could mean anything, which renders it vague and ambiguous.
Laws that purportedly pertain to people must be understood by those people or those people are not given an opportunity of informed consent and every form of governance foisted upon the people must be consented to by the people in this nation.
Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 1: We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority...
Declaration of Independence: Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...
The Ninth Amendment gives force of law to the rights and protections stated within the Declaration of Independence and other rights retained by the people.
Ninth Amendment to the US Constitution: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
All this to say, laws must clearly state, without vagueness or ambiguity, that which is specifically required or forbidden in particular and what is clearly, without vagueness or ambiguity, the consequences of non compliance with the law. Without this there can be no consent, without consent there is no authority.
Some would like this to be limited to vague laws that only you yourself are commanded to do or not to do something, and not to laws commanding government officials to violate the peoples rights, violate their Oaths of Office, injure the people and damage their properties.
There are literally hundreds of US Supreme Court rulings disposing of that nonsense, but here are a few, An Arizona statute imposing a one-year county residency requirement for indigents’ eligibility for non emergency medical care at state expense infringes the upon right to travel and violates the Equal Protection Clause. Davis v. Alaska, 415 U. S. 308 (1974). An Alaska statute protecting anonymity of juvenile offenders, as applied to prohibit cross-examination of a prosecution witness for possible bias, violates the Confrontation Clause. Smith v. Goguen, 415 U. S. 566 (1974). A Massachusetts statute punishing anyone who treats the flag “contemptuously” without anchoring the proscription to specified conduct and modes is unconstitutionally vague. Lubin v. Panish, 415 U. S. 709 (1974). A California statute imposing a filing fee as the only means to get on the ballot denied indigents equal protection. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk Comm’n, 416 U. S. 922 (1974).
When vague, ambiguous and/or arbitrary laws are imposed and enforced in any way, it is tyranny and when a vague and ambiguous law is used to violate one of the people's rights those people have standing to sue to void the vague, ambiguous and unconstitutional law used to injure them and/or damage their property (your rights are your property).Tyranny, in the Greco-Roman world, an autocratic form of rule in which one individual exercised power without any legal restraint. In antiquity the word tyrant was not necessarily pejorative and signified the holder of absolute political power. In its modern usage the word tyranny is usually pejorative and connotes the illegitimate possession or use of such power
Tyrant: a ruler who has unlimited power over other people, and uses it unfairly and cruelly. [https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/tyrant]
If anyone is wondering, when I use the words “tyrant” or “tyranny” I absolutely mean them in the most pejorative context available.
The fact that a required element of “emergency,” “widespread,” is not defined renders the definition of “emergency” vague, ambiguous and arbitrary, in other words unconstitutional and void.
The US Supreme Court and the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals says the same with authority in: Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), Dimaya v. Lynch, 803 F. 3d 1110 (2015) and Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ___ (2018)
Oregonians have been conned into believing the tyrant Kate Brown has lawful authority to do what she has and is doing to the people of Oregon, she does not, and she knows it or should know it.
A Governor cannot claim ignorance or mistake to enforcing a clearly unconstitutional statute that fails to define ANY key terms leaving all the requirements of an “emergency” undefined and therefore vague and ambiguous when that governor has access to unlimited legal consultation from experts, is an active Oregon BAR attorney, former Secretary of State, former State Senator, and former State Representative. She did this with full knowledge and ill intent.
But wait! There's more.
Some of you, like certain communist, racist, sexist US District Court judges, may say, well OK, but, it's a “highly contagious and deadly virus” that the tyrant must be allowed to protect us from and help us recover.
I may even agree, if there was in reality a “highly contagious and deadly virus” floating around Oregon AND that the tyrant had the means to end it, but I doubt it.
You are the only one that can keep you healthy, just as you are the only one who can keep yourself realitivly safe, only speaking in secular terms.
So, what about the irrational belief that “covid-19” is a “highly contagious and deadly virus?”
If you notice, the government and their minions push infection rates like parrots on crack and rarely mention deaths, ever wonder why?
The CDC has stated in it's deauthorization of the PCR test, the test Oregon has relied on to sport its so-called covid “infections,” that the PCR test could not distinguish between a common cold
infection, a normal yearly flu infection and the so-called covid-19 infection. There is also the fact that the PCR test can be adjusted to produce more positive or less positive at the discretion of the government franchised lab and their owners.
This brings into serious question the accuracy and honesty of the infection rate statistics and therefore into question whether there was ever a pandemic at all in Oregon.
While perhaps, in the most liberal sense, Oregon “could” be involved in a “pandemic,” (remember the definitions) if the collection of the data concerning mere “infection” was legitimate or dependable in any way, which it is now evidenced by the CDC, it is not.
The numbers concerning “infection” rates are suspect, as the test that created them has been deauthorized, and exposed as a manipulated research tool that was never designed as a diagnostic tool and can not even differentiate between cold, flu and “covid-19.”
Do you believe they did not know this a year ago?
The inventor, the creator of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, noble prize winner in chemistry, has stated in a widely available video that, “with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody” “cause if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of them in your body, OK, so that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it's meaningful.” and “PCR is separate from that, it's just a process that's use to make a whole lot of something outta something, that's what it is, it is not, it doesn't tell you that your sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with, really was gonna hurt you.”
If it does not tell you that your sick and doesn't tell you that what it detected will hurt you, it is not a diagnostic tool.
The CDC states that 75% of those who have died from Covid-19 have four or more comorbidities, meaning it is only a small and identifiable group in danger of becoming seriously ill and/or dying from “covid.”
Statistics from the State of Oregon itself demonstrate that there is not, nor has been, a deadly “pandemic” in Oregon.
The Oregon Health Authority, Center for Health Statistics publishes data that demonstrate the year 2015 had a 3.7% higher death rate per 100,000 that was present at the peak of the so-called “pandemic” in the year 2020. This is true even with the fact the death numbers are “presumed” and people are being counted as a “covid death” when covid was not the cause, as in a car wreck.
Here are the deaths per 100,000 data published by State of Oregon for the last five years, in 2015 there were 201.7 deaths per 100,000, 2016 198.1 per 100,000 2017 195.2 per 100,00 2018 194.5 per 100,000 2019 190.8 per 100,000 2020 194,2 per 100,000.
The State of Oregon's own statistics evidenced above shows that Oregon experienced the least amount of deaths per 100,000 in the last ten years in the year 2019, the 19 of COVID-19 and then the second lowest amount of deaths per 100,000 in the last ten years in Oregon occurred in 2020 the height of the purported “pandemic.” As a matter of fact 2015 was 6.5% more death in Oregon than in 2019 and 3.7% more than 2020.
Now 6.5% and 3.7% may not seem like much, however, when Oregon's population is 4,218,000 and 5,870 have presumably died from “covid-19” over the last two years amounting to a 0.14% presumed death rate from “covid-19” over two years that supposedly supports tyrannical measures against the well being of the people, against their will, then it is immense.
Hey, do any of you consider Fourteen Hundredths of One Percent to be “widespread?” Kate Brown does, this is why laws must be specifically and in particular defined.
To be clear, this is taking ONE percent (1%), splitting that ONE percent (1%) into ONE HUNDRED (100) pieces, 0.14 is fourteen of those one hundred pieces that make up one percent.
How exactly, by law, is One Fourteenth of One Percent demonstrated to be “widespread?”
How exactly, by evidence, does a State experience a 3.7% DECREASE in deaths per 100,000 in the year 2020, the height of the so-called “emergency” “pandemic,” as compared to 2015?
I'm waiting.
The only “emergency” occurring in Oregon is a power mad communist tyrant violating her Oath of Office, destroying the people of Oregon.
Getting sick then getting well is not an “emergency,” it is life, it IS the status quo.
The US Constitution guarantees a “Republican Form of Government” and while the US Supreme Court has claimed not to know what “Republican Form of Government” actually means in particular we can be assured that it does not mean a power mad, deviant, communist tyrant ruling by edict.
On December 21, 2021, the tyrant, Kate Brown, once again extended the “pandemic” “emergency” for the stated purposes of sucking up federal welfare money, flexibility, ruling by edict to which she
claims that her sole discretion has the full force of law in Oregon. Sounds like the Borg Queen to me (Star Trek reference)
There is nothing within ORS 401.165 or 401.025 which lawfully purports to authorize a declaration of “emergency” based on the governor's irrational fears or her desire for flexibility to operate outside the law nor does it authorize a declaration of “emergency” based on claims that “Oregon prepares for what could be our worst surge in hospitalizations during this pandemic,” “could be” is not a lawful or even legal justification to strip over four million people of their rights, which is their property, especially given the fact, based on the evidence, it is a lie.
Do you now understand why terms such as “threatens” must be defined within statute?
Your rights are your property and there is a Constitutional provision that when property is seized by the government that it must justly compensate its victims. COVID checks?
When the Kate Brown regime isn't straight out lying it is pushing half truths in an effort to mislead, for example, there is this claim, "Oregon’s safety requirements in place today regarding masks, vaccinations for K-12 educators and staff, and vaccinations for health care workers do not rely on the state of emergency declaration––instead, they are covered by agency administrative rules issued under existing state authority." If you work for the State then yes you are obligated to follow their dress code, however, if you do not then they have no jurisdiction to enforce it upon them who are not their employees or exercising some government privilege.
Oregon Occupational Safety and Health only has jurisdiction upon certain employers, not employees and certainly not the general population in the capacity of customers. Oregon Occupational Safety and Health cannot bestow upon the employers they regulate a jurisdiction or authority to enforce rules that they themselves do not possess.
An “emergency” declarations purpose, according to 401.032, Statement of policy and purpose states, “(1) The general purpose of this chapter is to reduce the vulnerability of the State of Oregon to loss of life, injury to persons or property and human suffering and financial loss resulting from emergencies, and to provide for recovery and relief assistance for the victims of emergencies.”
This non existent “emergency” has been perpetrated by Kate Brown for nearly two years now. The stated purpose of an “emergency” is to reduce vulnerability and to provide for recovery.
Kate Brown and the State of Oregon are instead promoting fear, discrimination, segregation, financial uncertainty, in other words Kate Brown and the State of Oregon have destabilized Oregon and made it more vulnerable by their violations.
None of Kate Brown's and the State of Oregon's measures are designed to successfully conclude the “emergency” with recovery, but to create an atmosphere where she can continuously, unlawfully extend an already vague and ambiguous void statute for any reason whatsoever, because if one can claim a 0.14% death rate over two years (that's 0.07% death rate per year) as “widespread” one can claim anything.
If you are thinking this could all be a big mistake, she didn't know, they meant well, etc, you are wrong. They knew long ago exactly what they were going to do and they KNEW and INTENDED to violate their Oaths and enforce unconstitutional dictates upon you under the color of law.
ORS 30.265(6)(f) states, “Any claim arising out of an act done or omitted under apparent authority of a law, resolution, rule or regulation that is unconstitutional, invalid or inapplicable except to the extent that they would have been liable had the law, resolution, rule or regulation been constitutional, valid and applicable, unless such act was done or omitted in bad faith or with malice.”
“Apparent authority of a law” is synonymous with “color of law.”
The State, a fictional entity, likes to foist itself as a “person,” even a “sovereign,” but what if you, an actual sovereign, committed a crime, got caught, and you plead ignorance, mistake, misunderstanding, etc. but then, the prosecution discovers that you wrote down your plans to commit the crime and how to get away with it? Is the prosecution likely to buy the ignorance, mistake, misunderstanding defense? ORS 30.165 is evidence that the State of Oregon has made plans to do unconstitutional acts under color of law in direct violation of the US Constitution, Oregon Constitution and 42 USC Sec. 1983.
42 USC Sec. 1983 trumps ORS 30.165 through the Fourteenth Amendment and the supremacy clause. 42 USC Sec. 1983 states in part, “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress...”
As a matter of fact, ORS 30.165(6)(f) is also in clear and direct violation of Article I, Section 10 of the Oregon Constitution which states in part, “...every man shall have remedy by due course of law for injury done him in his person, property, or reputation.” ORS 30.165 unlawfully purports to strip that right from the people of Oregon.
To enact such a statute demonstrates the State of Oregon's pre-meditated intention to commit unconstitutional acts, violate their Oaths of Office, strip Oregon's inhabitants of the right of Due Process, Due course of law and create a slave master relationship between the once free people of Oregon and their government and to give themselves immunity for all their unlawful premeditated acts of insurrection.
Insurrection. A rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its government.
Remember, when a Citizen becomes an elected official their authority to act only goes to the limits of their Oaths, when they violate the provisions of their Oaths they act in their private Citizen capacity.
When the statute falls the defendant officers are left "standing naked, as individuals clothed with no power emanating from the state, and thus viewed and considered alone as individuals assuming to act under the guise of law where no law exists; . . . "' Kans. Natural Gas Co. v. Haskell, (1909) 172 Fed. 555.
Oregon IS guaranteed a republican form of government and it IS “insurrection” for ANY State elected official or employee (as they only work under the authority of someone with an Oath) to claim “Our Democracy” as the form of government they are perpetrating and protecting.
Kate Brown stated, “As Oregon prepares for what could be our worst surge in hospitalizations during this pandemic.” Kate Brown is referring to her irrational fear of “omicron” which indications from South Africa and the United Kingdom signal that the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the corona-virus SARS-CoV-2 is less dangerous than its predecessor Delta.
“Omicron” is LESS dangerous than the “Delta,” yet in responding to the, what ever happened to “delta” anyway, surge of COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, the Governor for the most part did not use her executive authority to issue new emergency orders.
Clearly Kate Brown is clearly extending the unlawful “Emergency” by her own politically motivated discretion based on something other that the realistic threat from “Omicron” as she falsely and publicly implied, demonstrating her desire to spread irrational fear, making Oregon more vulnerable, a violation of Oregon law (ORS 401.032) and her Oath of Office.
Time has now shown us how full of excrement Kate Brown is and how irrational her fears are and what can happen when words like “threatens” is not defined within an “emergency” statute as it is not defined within ORS 401.165 or 401.025.
In England those who were infected with Omicron were about half as likely to require hospitalization or emergency care as were those infected with Delta. Michael Diamond, a virologist at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, and his colleagues infected hamsters and mice with Omicron and other variants to track disease progression.
The differences were staggering: after a few days, the concentration of virus in the lungs of animals infected with Omicron was at least ten times lower than that in rodents infected with other variants … Dr. Sanjay Gupta says that fears raised in late November by the multitude of mutations in Omicron’s genome have not borne out. The United Kingdom’s Health Minister, Gillian Keegan, was forced to admit last month that only one person had died from the Omicron Variant and that none of those hospitalized from it were on ventilators.
Forced to admit last month? You mean Kate Brown knew, or should have known, this before she unlawfully extended the “pandemic” “emergency” non “emergency” based on the “threat” from “omicron.”
Kate Brown extending the “emergency” based on her own irrational fear, or political agenda, of a variant that is shown to be less dangerous than the previous variant, to which she did not use her executive authority to issue new emergency orders, serves to evidence the arbitrary nature of the statute purportedly authorizing the declaration of “emergency” and the immediate danger of allowing such a statute to continue to be capriciously enforced or enforced in this manner in the future.
Kate Brown publicly stated that the latest extension through June is necessary to help Oregon access federal aid and to provide “flexibility.”
ORS 401.165 has no provision to declare a Statewide “emergency” for the purpose of making it easier for the State to get money from the federal government nor does it purport to provide authority to declare a Statewide “emergency” for flexibilities sake.
By the way, the “flexibility” she speaks of is the “flexibility to operate outside and in contradiction to Oregon Law and the people's unalienable rights.
Kate Brown is acting unlawfully outside her Oath of Office and causing the State of Oregon, under a color of authority, to do the same.
“That act was therefore as inoperative as if it had never been passed, for an unconstitutional act is not a law, and can neither confer a right or immunity nor operate to supersede any existing valid law." Chicago, Indianmpolia & Louisville Ry. v. Hackett, (1912) 227 U. S. 559, S. Ct., 57 L. Ed. 966.
"An act which violates the Constitution has no power and can, of course, neither build up or tear down. It can neither create new rights nor destroy existing ones. It is an empty legislative declaration without force or vitality." Carr v. State 127 Ind. 204, 26 N. E. 778; 11 L. R. A. 370 (1890)
But, but, but what about all those “covid-19” cases “exploding” “everywhere” you may ask.
Yeah, what about that.
The CDC has stated in it's deauthorization of the PCR test, the test Oregon has relied on to sport its so-called exploding covid “infections,” that the PCR test could not distinguish between a common cold infection, a normal yearly flu infection and the so-called covid-19 infection. There is also the fact that the PCR test can be adjusted to produce more positive or less positive at the discretion of the corporate government franchise lab and its owners.
This brings into serious question the accuracy, honesty and independence from political influence of the infection rate statistics and therefore into question whether there was ever a pandemic at all in Oregon.
If you had a government franchised lab which would be more profitable to you, setting the cycle threshold rate high to produce more positive tests therefore extending the “emergency” creating the “need” for more testing from you, more money for you OR to set the cycle threshold at the level to only detect contagious positives, less tests and less money for you?
It is not about bad greedy people faking results to make more money, necessarily, corporations have a legal obligation to it's stockholders to maximize profits, by any “legal” means.
Getting sick then getting well may suck but it is not a Statewide “emergency,” it IS the status quo. Oregon has not experienced an “emergency” and is not now.
“The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.
This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors or corona-virus patients, even though it could tell them how infectious the patients are, an idea of their actual viral load.
Of course this data is not disclosed, people may complain if they realize they don't have a viral load large enough to be communicable, yet forced into isolation to one degree or another.
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The New York Times found.
“On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new corona-virus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.” New York Times, Apoorva Mandavilli, July 3, 2021. SEE?
“One solution would be to adjust the cycle threshold used now to decide that a patient is infected. Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the corona-virus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus. Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk.” Dr. Michael Mina, epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Epidemiologist HA! The tyrant Borg Queen knows best.
In the same New York Times article above it states, “The Food and Drug Administration said in an emailed statement that it does not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that 'commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own'.”
“It’s just kind of mind-blowing to me that people are not recording the C.T. values from all these tests — that they’re just returning a positive or a negative,” Angela Rasmussen, virologist at Columbia University in New York.
Virologist HA! The tyrant Borg Queen knows best.
The evidence clearly suggests that the PCR tests, the tests Oregon has relied upon to create its“covid-19” infection rate statistics, is designed to produce the highest number of positive results, it cant tell the difference between cold, flu and “covid-19,” the cycle counts are undisclosed and commercial for profit firms, not Oregon Health Authorities, are in control of the results. “Mind blowing” indeed.
The evidence clearly demonstrates the irrationality, perhaps mental illness or demon possession, of fearing “omicron” or “covid-19,” unless of course you have chronic illness already, then you should take care to protect yourself.
The evidence demonstrates that no physical or literal “pandemic” “emergency” occurred within the State of Oregon as less people have died within Oregon during the purported “pandemic” “emergency” than died in any of the previous ten years, the PCR tests produce positive results from genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk at a rate of 90%, the cycle counts are not disclosed and the results are controlled by corporations, government franchise, motivated only by profit and the desires of it's creator. What could go wrong.
The founding principles of every one of the several States and the federal government is that they exist only by the will of the people and that anything done by government must be by the consent of the people.
The “people” is each singular man, both male and female. The “people” is not a mob of parasites who say they voted to take your property and will kill you if you don't give it to them, that's “Our Democracy” and why each State of the Union is guaranteed a “republican form” of government.
We have been, and too many of you are still being, conned right out of you and your children's future by (a) despicable lawless tyrant(s), the question persists, what are you going to do about it, vote by mail?